Saturday, June 23, 2012

Chapter VII. The Deportations of Prominent Calambeños


            Don Manuel Timoteo Hidalgo was perhaps the most outspoken supporter of Dr. Jose Rizal in Calamba. He was a brother-in-law of Rizal being the husband Saturnina,[1] Rizal’s elder sister. Although aware of the arbitrariness of those who were in power, Hidalgo was not afraid to speak his mind, after all, he held a degree in law from the University of Santo Tomas and had served as a directorcillo[2] of the court.
            As expected, Hidalgo gained many enemies. Without due process, the Superior Government decreed his banishment to the town of Tagbilaran, Province of Bohol. He did not even know his accuser or why he was banished. He believed, however, that it was Fr. Francisco Govea, the syndic of the Corporacion, who denounced him to the civil governor of the province. And through the Director General of Civil Administration, Don Benigno Quiroga Ballesteros, who inquired from the Governor General, Hidalgo found out that he was charged of spreading anti-religious and subversive ideas and of being a representative of Jose Rizal.
            Don Cipriano Rubio, former lieutenant and acting gobernadorcillo, also charged Hidalgo of being a filibustero. The charge was seconded by Juan Lopez, a lieutenant of guardia civil and a harsh critic of Rizal. The other adverse witnesses were Capitan Lucas and Capitan Quico, who, Hidalgo believed, had axes to grind against him.[3]
            Thus, amidst the howling of his family, Hidalgo and a servant left Calamba as exiles.[4] On 6 October 1888, they arrived in Cebu, where they took a boat to Tagbilaran. Hidalgo was the first to be deported on account of the agrarian problem in the hacienda.[5] Upon informed, Jose Rizal worked relentlessly in Spain for Hidalgo’s exculpation. All his pleas, however, fell on deaf ears.
            Year 1889, the situation in Calamba worsened. The past locust infestations, low price of sugar and other natural calamities had taken their toll. The practice of the hacienda of not issuing receipts to rents paid[6] aggravated the situation. If ever receipts were released, these were useless as these contained neither signature nor indication of any amount paid. The receipts only stated the taxpayers’ names and the fact that the tax for that year had been paid.[7] Thus, year after year, the unpaid rents increased enormously for payments may end up unreported.
            By August, after the tenants boycotted the May canon collection, the hacienda formally asked the court for the eviction of defaulting tenants.[8] The list of receivables shown to the governor general during his November visit at the hacienda appeared that the tenants paid nothing. This alarmed the governor general for it displayed civil disobedience. [9]
            In November, Don Manuel Hidalgo was allowed to return to Luzon to take care of his family’s businesses. He and his wife Neneng owned sugar plantations in Tanawan, Batangas and Los Baños, Laguna. After gathering the sugar crops and settling his businesses, Hidalgo was again decreed by governor general to be banished back to Tagbilaran. He was again denounced by the syndic and the lay brothers as the instigator of the recent Calamba disturbances.[10] He was arrested on the Christmas day of 1889 while dining with his family.[11]
            Year 1890, the tenants still have no money to pay their obligations. When the Visitador arrived for the collection of annual canon, only Don Eusebio Elepaño, Don Pantaleon Quintero and few other families were able to pay.[12] The defaulting tenants’ only hope lied on Jose Rizal’s suggestion that their refusal to pay may allow the case to reach the Supreme Court in Madrid via appeal.[13] So hopeful were the penniless tenants that detractors had to fabricate stories about Rizal to demoralize them. Negative rumors about Rizal spread. Some of these rumors were: that Rizal was purchased by the friars and had changed side; that he was imprisoned in Madrid; and worst, he was poisoned to death.[14]
            By May, Judge Celestino Dimayuga of the Court of First Instance of Laguna ordered the eviction Don Francisco Rizal Mercado from his tenanted lands in the hacienda. Don Nicasio Eisagani met the same fate. With the principal tenants evicted, a number of families working for them were also evicted. Both judgments were promptly appealed before the Audiencia in Manila, which dismissed the case for lack of merit. With waning hope, the Calambeños, appealed their cases before the Tribunal Supremo in Madrid.
            Knowing what the friars can do pending appeal, Governor Mompeon persuaded Gobernadorcillo Elepaño to try to work for a compromise between the parties. Finding Elepaño unable to contain the crisis plus the rumors of French or German reinforcement to the “Calamba rebellion,” Governor Mompeon, tried to solve the problem himself. But the Calambeños, penniless, can’t offer any compromise except to wait for the outcome of the appeals of Francisco Mercado and Nicasio Eigasani in Madrid. Frustrated, Governor Mompeon took the Calambeño’s refusal to pay rents as filibusterism and ordered the appearance before the government of its apparent leaders: Silvestre Ubaldo, Antonino Lopez, Leandro Lopez, Paciano Rizal and Mateo Elejorde.[15] A week later, 14 August 1890, evictions commenced.[16]
            Some lettered Calambeños were vocal and thus, were charged to have incited others to fight the authorities. As a preventive measure, on 6 September 1890, at 4:30 o’clock in afternoon, Silvestre Ubaldo, Antonino Lopez, Leandro Lopez, Paciano Rizal and Mateo Elejorde, all apparent leaders, were shipped to Mindoro as exiles on board the steamer Brutus.[17] Subsequent query by their relatives revealed that although there were deportation papers, there were no formal accusations against them. Thus, there was no due process.
            The deportees stayed in the town of Calapan, the capital of Mindoro, where they rented a furnished house for seven (7) pesos a month.[18] Later, the government attempted to transfer them to Jolo due to rumors that they were still communicating with their relatives in Calamba, inducing the latter to bring their deportation case to court.[19]
            Year 1891 was a fateful year. Its first two months were marked with violent evictions and dispossessions. Calamba was in total disarray.[20] In October, Governor General Valeriano Weyler sent armed troops, under the command of Colonel Francisco Olive y Garcia, to effect the orders of eviction. Col. Olive also recommended the exile of twenty-five (25) Calambeños who “formed a strong body to oppose not only the Dominicans but also the Spanish domination in the Philippines.” The colony, if left unchecked, will soon plunge into a revolution.[21]
            Acting on the recommendation, on 13 November 1891, the Secretariat of the General Government of the Philippines informed the Civil Governor of Manila that the Governor General banished to the Island of Jolo twenty-five (25) residents of the town of Calamba, province of Laguna. The Civil Governor of Manila was expected to confine the deportees in the capital’s public jail and to order their embarkation in next the mail steamship bound for the Island of Jolo in Mindanao.
            The deportees were: Don Francisco Rizal Mercado, Doña Saturnina Rizal Realonda, Doña Narcisa Rizal Realonda, Doña Lucia Rizal Realonda, Doña Petrona Quintero Paña, Don Nicolas Llamas Rizal, Don Aquilino Gicolea Hervolario, Don Matias Belarmino Quintera, Don Velentin Elejorde Alcala, Don Patricio Rizal, Don Nicasio Eygasani[22] Alcala and Don Raymundo Alviar Faolmino.
Also included were: Don Rafael Elejorde, Don Santos Gicolea, Don Cayetano de Jesus, Don Luis Elasegui Ustaris, Don Custodio Faulmague, Don Angel Alcuyaga, Don Pascual Alcaraz, Don Ysaac Alviar Alcala, Don Victor Alviar Lopez, Don Mamerto Alviar Faolmino, Don Pio Alcala Arambulo, Don Felipe Habacon Cañope[23] and Don Narciso Habacon.[24]
            The next day, 14 November 1891, Don Nicolas Llamas Rizal, Don Cayetano de Jesus, Don Patricio Rizal and Don Felipe Habacon Cañope were arrested by the Guardia Civil under the command Col. Miguel Concepcion.[25] They were imprisoned in Bilibid awaiting their deportation to Jolo.[26] Atty. Jose Maria Gutierrez, a peninsular Spaniard, negotiated the lifting up of the deportation orders of the twenty-five (25) from the new Governor General but failed. The arrested deportees were placed on board en route to Jolo on 28 November 1891.[27] The wives of the deportees also presented a petition to the Governor General.[28]
            Don Francisco Rizal Mercado evaded Jolo deportation by escaping to Hong Kong together with Don Paciano Rizal and Silvestre Ubaldo who also evaded completing their Mindoro deportation.[29] They were assisted by Partido Rizalino, a political party organized by patriotic Filipinos in Manila. The party hid them in the house of Martin Zamosa and then facilitated their escape to Hong Kong. Zamosa, a Chinese subject, was later on imprisoned because of the said acts.[30]
            Manuel Hidalgo, not having returned to Tagbilaran, and wife Saturnina, another Jolo deportee, were in Manila, hiding. Although unafraid, they avoided being seen by the authorities. Tenetur, Hidalgo wrote, tadere se ipsum (Latin: To make one visible is to deliver oneself).[31] Don Matias Belarmino was arrested in his house on Christmas Eve of 1891. He was stricken with fever thus he was incarcerated in Calamba until he was well. He was brought to Manila and later deported to Jolo.[32] All in all, only seventeen (17) of the twenty-five (25) Calambeños decreed to be deported were arrested and sent to Jolo.[33]            
            On 23 November 1891, Doña Teodora Alonzo and Doña Josefa Rizal Mercado were also arrested and were turned over to the Civil Governor of the Province of Manila.[34] However, they were released on the same day because their names were not in the list of deportees.[35] Josefa’s real name, however, was suspected to be Saturnina, a name included in the deportation list. Thus, the Civil Government of Manila had to request the Civil Guards of Calamba to verify the baptismal records of Josefa Rizal Realonda if the name Saturnina appeared.[36] Likewise, the baptismal records of Saturnina, Narcisa and Lucia, all surnamed Rizal Realonda, were ordered verified for any entry of other names.[37] The provincial government answered that all of them had singular names and their parents were Francisco Rizal Mercado and Teodora Realonda.[38]
            As the name Teodora Alonzo, which appeared in the cedula personal (personal document) did not tally with name Teodora Realonda appearing in the baptismal records of her children, the old woman was subsequently accused of falsification of cedula. Thus, on 28 November 1891, Teodora Alonzo and Josefa were rearrested and delivered to the Civil Governor of Laguna. Austin Craig, a Rizal biographer who had the opportunity of interviewing the surviving Rizal relatives before 1913, stated that despite the presence of boats regularly plying the upstream of Pasig River towards Laguna, “the two women were ordered to be taken there (Santa Cruz, Laguna) for trial on foot.” The guards who escorted them, however, carried the elderly lady in a hammock.[39]
            Soon, before the yuletide of 1891, Doña Teodora Alonzo, Lucia Rizal Herbosa and Josefa Rizal joined the rest of the family in Hong Kong. The reunion turned out to be one of the happiest times in Jose Rizal’s short life. “Here we are,” Rizal wrote his good friend Ferdinand Blumentritt, “all living together, my parents, sisters, and brother, in peace and far from the prosecutions they suffered in the Philippines. They are very much pleased with the English government.”[40]





                [1]Being younger, Rizal affectionately called her Señora Neneng.
                [2]Secretary
                [3] Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Cebu, 15 October 1888. Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 278-279; Tagbilaran, 1 January 1889, 280-281.
                [4]Saturnina Rizal to Jose Rizal, Manila, 6 September 1890, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 318-319.
                [5]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Cebu, 15 October 1888. Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 279.
                [6]Paciano Rizal to Jose Rizal, Calamba, 26 May 1883, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members, (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 96-99.
                [7]Mariano Herbosa to Jose Rizal, Calamba, 29 August 1886, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 239-241.
                [8]Sentencia en el Juicio de Desahucio Contra Francisco Rizal y Mercado Deligancia de Consamiento.
                [9]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Calamba, 28 November 1889. Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 286-287.
                [10]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Calamba, 28 November 1889. Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 286-287.
                [11]Saturnina Rizal to Jose Rizal, Manila, 2 June 1890. Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 306. 
                [12]Silvestre Ubaldo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 30 June 1890, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members, (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 364-365.
                [13]Paciano Rizal to Jose Rizal, no place, 27, May 1890, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members, (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 295 - 298.
                [14]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 1 April 1890. Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 292.
                [15]Silvestre Ubaldo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 11 August 1890, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members, (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 316.
                [16]Nicasio Eigasani to Jose Rizal and Marcelo H. del Pilar, 14 January 1891, Epistolario Rizalino, Vol. III, 140.
                [17]Saturnina Rizal to Jose Rizal, Manila, 6 September 1890, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 318-319.
                [18]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 1890, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 265-266.
                [19]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 7 March 1892, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 339-340.
                [20]Narcisa Rizal to Jose Rizal, Calamba, 10 March 1891, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 323-324.
                [21]Seccion de Cronicas (Archivo de la Provincia de Santissimo Rosario, Tomo 3, folio 178 vuelto).
                [22]Also spelled as Eigasani.
                [23] In subsequent communications, his name was spelled as Felipe Abacon, see Primer Teniente Comandante del Primer Tercio de la Guardia Civil a Gobernador Civil de Manila, 14 November 1891 in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 38.
                [24]Secretaria del Gobierno General de Filipinas a Gobernador Civil de Manila, Manila, 13 Noviembre 1891, facsimile in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 26-30.      
                [25]Primer Teniente Comandante del Primer Tercio de la Guardia Civil a Gobernador Civil de Manila, Manila, 16 Noviembre 1891. See Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 39.
                [26]Orden del Gobierno Civil de Manila de Entrega de Cuatro Individuos a la Carcel de Bilibid, 16 Noviembre 1891. See Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 40.
                [27]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 1 December 1891, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 325-327.
                [28]Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 7 March 1892, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 339-340.
                [29]Jose Rizal to Maria Rizal Mercado, Hong Kong, 9 December 1891, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 329-330.
                [30] Buencamino, Felipe, Sr. Sixty Years of Philippine History, Alfonso Lecaros, (trans.), 16.
                [31] Manuel T. Hidalgo to Jose Rizal, Manila, 1 December 1891, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 325-327.
                [32]Concepcion Leyba to Jose Rizal, Manila, 30 December 1891, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 335-336.
                [33]Antonino Lopez to Jose Rizal, 17 March 1892, Letters Between Rizal and Family Members (Manila: National Heroes Commission, 1964), 342-343.
                [34]Comandante Jefe de la Guardia Civil a Gobernador Civil de la Provincia, Manila, 23 Noviembre 1891, facsimile in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 31.
            [35]Gobierno Civil de la Provincia a Comandante de la Guardia Civil Veterana, Manila 23 Noviembre 1891, in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 44.
                [36]Gobierno Civil Provincial a Gobierno Civil a Teniente de la Guardia Civil de Calamba, Manila, 26 Noviembre 1891, in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 52.   
                [37]Gobierno Civil de la Provincia a Gobierno Civil de La Laguna, Manila, 24 Noviembre 1891, in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 46.  
                [38]Gobierno Civil de La Laguna a Gobierno Civil de la Provincia, Laguna, 27 Noviembre 1891, in Ang Nawaglit na Tahanan: Mga Bagong-Tuklas na Tala Ukol kay Rizal at Mga Taga-Calamba, (Manila: Pambansang Sinupan ng mga Tala, 1997), 54. 
                [39]Austin Craig, Lineage, Life and Labors of Jose Rizal: Philippine Patriot, (Manila: Philippine Education Company, 1913), 171-172.
                [40]Epistolario Rizalino, Vol. V, Part II, 632.  

No comments:

Post a Comment